Join our mailing list!
(Your shopping cart is empty)
Diane Publishing Books
Arizona v. United States: A Limited Role for States in Immigration Enforcement
Kate M. Manuel (au); Michael John Garcia (au)
On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in Arizona v. United States, ruling that some aspects of an Arizona statute intended to deter unlawfully present aliens from remaining in the state were preempted by federal law, but also holding that Arizona police were not facially preempted from running immigration status checks on persons stopped for state or local offenses. In reaching these conclusions, the Supreme Court made clear that opportunities for states to take independent action in the field of immigration enforcement are more constrained than some had previously believed. In recent years, several states and localities have adopted measures intended to deter the presence of unauthorized aliens within their jurisdiction. Contents of this report: Introduction; The Courtäó»s Decision in Arizona; Implications of Arizona Decision; Conclusion. This is a print on demand report.
Not Fade Away: The On-Line World Remembers Jerry Garcia
New View of Self: How Genes & Neurotransmitters Shape Your Mind, Your Personality, & Your Mental Health
War of the Rebellion: Official Records of the Union & Confederate Armies: Series I, Volume I
Share your knowledge of this product with other customers...
Be the first to write a review
Diane Publishing Co
PO Box 617
Darby, PA 19023-0617
Become an Affiliate
Send Us Feedback
Copyright ï¿½ 2004 Diane Publishing Company. All Rights Reserved.